We successfully completed the representation of a family (the \u201cY\u201d Family) in their immigration appeal of removal orders for misrepresentation arising from one of the largest immigration frauds in Canadian immigration history, New Can. It was a perpetuated fraudulent scheme that affected several thousand applicants \u2013 both permanent residents and citizenships.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This particular matter started at the Federal Court of Appeal and eventually ended in two wins at the Immigration Appeal Division. One case was allowed on Discretionary (H&C) Relief after a hearing in Vancouver, while one allowed through a Pre-Hearing Conference in Toronto, on Minister Counsel\u2019s consent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What made this case rewarding is the fact that two grandparents are able to now stay with their grandson and granddaughter in Canada. Another couple (twin sisters) are able to pursue their full lives \u2013 including a relationship with a foreign national that was put in limbo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Their case was ultimately compelling, but often times the immigration record produced through inadmissibility allegations tells only part of the story. As their representative, we needed to be the go-betweens and communicators to weave the law with the facts, presenting our client\u2019s case in a legally and factually compelling manner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We wanted to share what we learned from taking on this case below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We wanted to review a few critical junctures of this case, in a bit of a post-mortem, as to where we believe key decisions were made that were both correct and incorrect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When we took on the case, our clients were prepared to go to the Federal Court of Appeal one of several families in group litigation over a matter of statutory interpretation (that was ultimately unsuccessful). Importantly, the Applicant did not want to be there, did not know why they were there, and were not adequately engaged to put forth a strong factual case at the earlier s.44 report stage. In short, former counsel was eager to go FCA but not as eager to hear out why their case should be successful on appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Again, we cannot stress how important it is to spend adequate time (and resources \u2013 including paying for adequate translation) to understand the Applicant\u2019s unique factual circumstances. In this case too there were legal circumstances regarding the age of the (then) children at the time of the misrepresentation hearing which could have been better explored and ultimately served as a sword for a two-prong approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Had the case focused on the individual factual scenario rather than an intellectual pursuit, it would have arguably been resolved much earlier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This one is something we recognized in hindsight was something we could have done differently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We decided at Immigration Division to do a half in\/half out strategy of neither conceding the allegations nor putting the clients on to testify. Our fear that a fight would negatively affect the assessment of remorse or other discretionary factors were ultimately unfounded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In cases where there is a legal question, have it answered early \u2013 there is no use dragging it on for strategic purposes. Often times, the system scares us or directs us into seeking only discretionary relief but in cases where the law needs to be fought or challenged \u2013 do it. Also, put your witnesses up for testimony rather than rely on counsel\u2019s submissions to advance points of fact on to the record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ultimately, we did use the possible challenge of the legal test at the IAD as a a leverage, but the file could have flowed more effectively with an upfront challenge. They say hindsight is 20\/20. Lesson learned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When we started this matter, it was an uphill battle \u2013 but mainly because we did not have a full and complete factual record. Client\u2019s previous counsel did not spend adequate time canvassing the full factual record, instead lumping the family into one big misrepresentation matter. When we parsed it together, we realized we had not just a family of four, but really three separate scenarios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our decision early on to realize there was:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1) a weaker case for mom,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2) a slightly stronger case for dad, and<\/p>\n\n\n\n
3) two strong cases for the daughters<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Understanding this difference allowed us to storyboard the approach to how we wanted to fight it. It helped that a natural separation (the daughters lived in Ontario and the IAD in Toronto was delayed) helped us, yet at first we were concerned about having the weaker cases go first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, ultimately \u2013 \u2018best interest of the child\u2019 \u2013 the key concept that continues to drive litigation in the humanitarian and compassionate grounds\/discretionary case area helped us significantly. The Member had a very compassionate understanding (one we were able to get from Minister\u2019s Counsel as well in their cross-examination strategy) helped us tremendously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One thing we learned, that can be a huge practice tip, is that in certain cases \u2013 particularly where large scale misrepresentations are involved \u2013 there may be higher powers or departmental direction not to consent on these cases. Even where on paper you may appear strong you cannot forgo sufficient investment in client preparation for direct and cross-examination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Also when one matter is successful, you can utilize the success obtained to be guiding (although not binding) on the second matter. When the first one consented on discretionary factors, factors that were stronger in the daughter\u2019s cases, we leveraged this to try and pursue alternative remedies. Ultimately, we were able to obtain a PHC, and avoid a longer, re-traumatizing, and time consuming process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The IAD, especially in the COVID-era, has been seeking to have more PHCs to better streamline cases. Especially with the IAD Rules changing to require upfront disclosure, this will no doubt be an increasingly necessary process to help take into account the often dynamic situations appellants face and experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Client wanted to leave us a positive Google Review, but since we\u2019ve decided to forgo the use of Google Reviews for our business, they sent us this snippet for us to share publicly:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After losing one appeal with my wife and my two daughters, we hired Will through a friend\u2019s recommendation. During the entire immigration appeal process, we appreciated Will\u2019s professionalism.<\/p>
First of all, he listened carefully to our statement of the cause and effect, and took notes including every details. After that, Will made the plan step by step, and organized every evidence and related documents. In the last three years, when there is a question, we could almost get reply in 24 hours. My wife and I both know that all cases involving New Can Company were rarely successful. We are fortunate to have Will, who trusts us and understands our difficulties. Will was very responsive in the hearing. Everything went well because of his preparations in advance. At last, my wife\u2019s and my appeal in Vancouver, and my two daughters\u2019 appeal in Toronto were both successful. Our whole family is very grateful to Will and his team!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
We thank the \u201cY\u201d Family for being excellent clients, and we wish them well as they rebuild their lives in Canada with the certainty of status and hopes of citizenship.<\/h3>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
We successfully completed the representation of a family (the \u201cY\u201d Family) in their immigration appeal of removal orders for misrepresentation arising from one of the largest immigration frauds in Canadian immigration history, New Can. It was a perpetuated fraudulent scheme that affected several thousand applicants \u2013 both permanent residents and citizenships.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":9685,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","success_stories_category":[683,686],"success_stories_tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter - Heron Law Offices<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter - Heron Law Offices\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"We successfully completed the representation of a family (the \u201cY\u201d Family) in their immigration appeal of removal orders for misrepresentation arising from one of the largest immigration frauds in Canadian immigration history, New Can. It was a perpetuated fraudulent scheme that affected several thousand applicants \u2013 both permanent residents and citizenships.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Heron Law Offices\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6\u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/\",\"name\":\"Heron Law Offices\",\"description\":\"Lawyers for Migrant Communities\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-CN\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-CN\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Client-Wins.-e1720469148319.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Client-Wins.-e1720469148319.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/\",\"name\":\"Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter - Heron Law Offices\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-17T09:03:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-17T09:03:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-CN\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Success Stories\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter\"}]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter - Heron Law Offices","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter - Heron Law Offices","og_description":"We successfully completed the representation of a family (the \u201cY\u201d Family) in their immigration appeal of removal orders for misrepresentation arising from one of the largest immigration frauds in Canadian immigration history, New Can. It was a perpetuated fraudulent scheme that affected several thousand applicants \u2013 both permanent residents and citizenships.","og_url":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/","og_site_name":"Heron Law Offices","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"6\u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/","name":"Heron Law Offices","description":"Lawyers for Migrant Communities","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"zh-CN"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"zh-CN","url":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Client-Wins.-e1720469148319.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Client-Wins.-e1720469148319.png","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/","name":"Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter - Heron Law Offices","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-01-17T09:03:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-17T09:03:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-CN","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/appeal-allowed-how-we-ended-one-familys-decade-long-misrepresentation-matter\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Success Stories","item":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/success_stories\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Appeal Allowed: How We Ended One Family\u2019s Decade Long Misrepresentation Matter"}]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_stories\/9882"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_stories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/success_stories"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9882"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_stories\/9882\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"success_stories_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_stories_category?post=9882"},{"taxonomy":"success_stories_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/heronlaw.ca\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_stories_tags?post=9882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}