阅读我们在 Ferreria v Canada（Citizenship and Immigration）, 2026 FC 267 一案中的联邦法院成功案例。在该父母及祖父母团聚担保申请中，我们成功挑战了移民官违反程序公平原则的决定。
这一结果再次确认了加拿大移民制度中公平性、透明度和问责的重要性。移民官有责任合理适用法律，并清楚地向申请人说明申请中存在的不足之处。
Heron 律师事务所成功协助一名加拿大留学生回应 IRCC 程序公正性函件（PFL），阻止签发第 44(1) 条不可入境报告，避免潜在驱逐令，帮助其继续在加拿大完成学业。
Our client had been invited to apply for and had submitted an application for permanent residence through Express Entry, self-represented. During the final stages of processing, our client received a Procedural Fairness Letter (PFL) outlining the officer’s concerns regarding their failure to disclose a past visa refusal in their application. Upon consulting with our lawyer, we helped our client submit an extension of time request and developed a strategy to alleviate the Officer’s concerns through our written response. In less than one month, our client received instructions to continue with the PR landing process.
我们的客户受邀申请并通过快速通道DIY递交了永久居留申请。在申请的最后阶段，我们的客户收到了一封程序公正信（PFL），信中概述了签证官对其在申请中涉及未披露过去的拒签历史的顾虑。在与我所律师协商后，我们帮助客户提交了延期申请，并制定了一项策略，通过书面答复来减轻签证官的顾虑。在不到一个月的时间里，我们的客户就收到了继续进行 PR Landing 登陆程序的指示。
Learn about the Coach Will service offered by immigration lawyer Will Tao, who helps RCICs refine their submissions, ensuring effective communication through law and policy to achieve successful outcomes for clients.