Our Immigration Blog

Tag: Judicial Review

Undue Delay as Abuse of Process: Fighting a Losing Battle at the ID?

Immigrating to Canada is a long process. Depending on the type of application submitted, it can take anywhere from a few weeks to a few years to receive a decision. Certain applications see initial movement, then find themselves in a vacuous state – not entirely refused, but not accepted either. Cases referred to the Immigration Division (ID) under s. 44(1) of the IRPA often fit in this category.

When is the time between referral to the ID and the admissibility hearing considered too long so as to constitute an abuse of process? This blog will discuss the legal test for undue delay as abuse of process and recent case law where no abuse of process was found despite lengthy delays.

READ MORE >>

Heron Law Offices Case Law Countdown: #1

Justice Little recently dismissed an application for judicial review of the Minister’s decision to cease the Applicant’s refugee status, concluding that the RPD reasonably analyzed the Applicant’s subjective intent with regard to re-availment.

READ MORE >>

Heron Law Offices Case Law Countdown: #2

In a recent decision, Madam Justice Aylen rejected an Applicant’s interpretation of R 98.01(2) and 98.08(2) with respect to permanent residence applications under the Start-up Business Class Program.

READ MORE >>

Heron Law Offices Case Law Countdown: #3

Justice Régimbald recently found that an Officer erred by failing to consider the Applicant’s claim of prejudice because of undue delay by making no mention in the reasons if the Applicant’s evidence on this point had been considered.

READ MORE >>

Heron Law Offices Case Law Countdown: #4

In this decision involving six judicial review applications, Justice Southcott found that there was no breach of procedural fairness arising from the PFLs issued to the Applicants, nor in relation to their reconsideration requests.

READ MORE >>

Get Started with a Consultation

Translate »